Table of Contents
As the Netherlands approaches its national elections on October 29, the political landscape is undergoing significant changes. Among the candidates, Henri Bontenbal, the leader of the center-right Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA), distinguishes himself with his commitment to a moderate and less confrontational political style.
In a climate often characterized by sensationalism and aggressive rhetoric, Bontenbal’s measured approach contrasts sharply with that of far-right leader Geert Wilders.
A different political narrative
Bontenbal has attracted attention for his decision to avoid direct confrontations with Wilders, despite the latter’s provocative positions.
“You don’t see me lash out against other parties that often,” he remarked at a recent event at the High Tech Campus in Eindhoven. This approach underscores his strategy of prioritizing substantive issues over personal attacks, a method he believes appeals to voters seeking stability.
Roots and rise in politics
Born into a large Protestant family in Rotterdam, Bontenbal’s political journey began unexpectedly. His entry into parliament occurred when he temporarily replaced the prominent former politician Pieter Omtzigt. Although he faced significant challenges, including a sharp decline in the CDA’s support, which dropped to just five seats shortly after he took leadership, Bontenbal has managed to reposition the party.
It is now a serious contender, polling closely with the Socialist-Greens coalition.
Key priorities for the election
At a recent gathering, Bontenbal presented four key priorities for the Dutch electorate. These include addressing the housing shortage, reforming asylum seeker policies, tackling the nitrogen crisis, and investing in future economic growth.
These topics resonate deeply with voters, particularly as the Netherlands approaches its third election in under five years, following a period marked by political instability.
Emphasizing stability and trust
Bontenbal’s campaign highlights the principles of decency, stability, and trust.
He advocates for a government that entrepreneurs can depend on, emphasizing long-term investments rather than immediate tax cuts. “When I talk to entrepreneurs, their primary concern is not about lowering taxes; they seek stability for the years ahead,” he stated, reinforcing his dedication to fostering a predictable political climate.
The appeal of being boring
In a surprising twist, Bontenbal embraces the label of being “boring” in politics. He stated, “I’m not ordered to be the funniest or to make the craziest remarks.” This viewpoint reflects his belief that politics should prioritize effective governance rather than resemble a circus or theater. This stance contrasts sharply with Wilders, known for his provocative style, which has earned him the title of the “best megaphone for dissatisfaction and anger.”
As the election nears, Bontenbal’s call for a return to calm political discourse resonates with voters fatigued by divisive rhetoric. He asserts that the political climate in the Netherlands can improve if leaders focus on constructive dialogue instead of confrontation.
Looking to the future
Bontenbal’s political philosophy resonates with a growing number of voters seeking a departure from the chaos of the recent past. His message emphasizes collaboration and focuses on core issues like housing and migration. This positions him as a potential kingmaker in the upcoming government negotiations. As the CDA gains momentum, the question remains whether Bontenbal’s strategy will be sufficient to challenge Wilders and reshape the Dutch political landscape.
In an era marked by political polarization, Bontenbal presents a vision that could restore faith in democratic processes. “What we want to present is a politics of hope and responsibility,” he stated, as the country prepares to make its choice.
