Table of Contents
In a significant political development, Alberta’s legislature is undergoing a transformation as constituents initiate recall petitions against members of the United Conservative Party (UCP). Currently, 17 MLAs from Premier Danielle Smith’s party are officially facing these petitions, marking a historic moment as this is the first time the province’s Recall Act has been activated against provincial politicians.
Notably, opposition NDP member Amanda Chapman is also included in this wave of petitions. Additionally, reports indicate that three more MLAs may be targeted soon. One petitioner from Brooks-Medicine Hat has received confirmation from Elections Alberta regarding the approval of her recall campaign against Premier Smith.
The recall process in Alberta
The Recall Act, established under former UCP Premier Jason Kenney, aims to empower citizens and enhance political accountability between elections. To initiate a recall, a petitioner must provide a brief explanation—no more than 100 words—detailing their reasons for seeking an MLA’s removal. The petitioner must reside within the constituency and submit a processing fee of $500.
Once approved by Elections Alberta, the applicant has 90 days to gather signatures. The required number of signatures must equal at least 60 percent of the votes cast in the last election for that constituency. If the petition meets these criteria, a vote will occur within four months to determine the MLA’s fate.
Petitioners’ complaints and politicians’ responses
Several constituents have voiced complaints against their elected officials. For instance, petitioner Jennifer Yeremiy contends that Education Minister Nicolaides has prioritized privatization over a public education system suffering from inadequate funding. In contrast, Nicolaides argues that recall petitions should focus on an MLA’s core responsibilities rather than general dissatisfaction with government policy.
Another petitioner, Derek Keenan, seeks the removal of MLA Pitt, citing a lack of communication and advocacy for her constituents. Pitt, serving as the deputy Speaker, has countered these claims, suggesting that Keenan is leveraging his position as a school principal to launch a politically motivated attack.
As the petitions circulate, some MLAs are defending their actions. For instance, Casey Klein has accused MLA Dyck of prioritizing party interests over constituents’ needs, to which Dyck responded by emphasizing his commitment to accessibility and engagement with all 46,000 individuals in his constituency.
Political implications of the recall efforts
The activation of the Recall Act carries significant political ramifications. Alberta Federation of Labour President Gil McGowan has criticized Premier Smith for fostering an environment conducive to recall petitions. He attributes the political discontent to Smith and her government’s actions, particularly the use of the notwithstanding clause to end a recent province-wide teachers’ strike.
McGowan has dismissed claims by Smith that union leaders have orchestrated the recall campaigns, stating that the law restricts organizations like his from directly organizing these efforts. He believes such accusations distract from the government’s shortcomings.
Future of the Recall Act
In light of the ongoing recall efforts, Premier Smith is reportedly considering adjustments to the Recall Act. During a recent UCP convention, she conducted a straw poll to gauge attendees’ opinions on potential changes, although support for revising the process appeared lukewarm. A spokesperson for the Premier has indicated that discussions on electoral legislation may occur, but no amendments to the Recall Act are currently planned.
Notably, opposition NDP member Amanda Chapman is also included in this wave of petitions. Additionally, reports indicate that three more MLAs may be targeted soon. One petitioner from Brooks-Medicine Hat has received confirmation from Elections Alberta regarding the approval of her recall campaign against Premier Smith.0
