Table of Contents
Legal action filed against celebrity esthetician
In a concerning development, Victoria Nelson has initiated legal proceedings against prominent celebrity esthetician Sonya Dakar. Nelson alleges that a chemical peel treatment received at Dakar’s Beverly Hills clinic resulted in severe burns and permanent scarring on her face. This incident took place during a visit to the upscale clinic, known for catering to high-profile clients, including Gwyneth Paltrow and Drew Barrymore.
The lawsuit, filed in Los Angeles, accuses Dakar of fraud and unlawful business practices and seeks approximately $71,000 in damages. Notably, the lawsuit emphasizes that the financial claim is not solely for physical injuries. It also asserts that Nelson was misled about Dakar’s qualifications and the legitimacy of the treatments provided.
Background of the incident
Nelson, founder and CEO of Undeniable Entertainment, has been a client of Dakar since 2019, initially seeking treatment for acne. After spending nearly $71,000 on various treatments over four years, Nelson claims that a chemical peel she received was unauthorized and used an unknown substance, resulting in facial burns.
Allegations of malpractice
Legal documents reveal that Nelson alleges an unidentified substance—presumably an acidic solution—was applied during the facial treatment. This led to severe burns on her cheeks, forehead, and under one eyebrow. Nelson describes the aftermath as devastating, stating that her face sustained significant damage, and despite approximately 30 follow-up sessions, the injuries have not healed.
In her complaint, Nelson raises concerns about several charges made to her account, claiming many were unauthorized. She specifically disputes a charge of $6,495 from November 5, asserting that she did not purchase any service or treatment on that date. This situation highlights serious questions regarding the billing practices at Dakar’s clinic, which Nelson describes as misleading.
Licensing concerns
The controversy surrounding Dakar extends beyond Nelson’s allegations. An examination of public records indicates that Dakar’s clinic license expired in September and was subsequently revoked in April due to significant violations, including the use of advanced medical devices without the necessary licenses. The California Board of Barbering and Cosmetology had previously flagged the clinic for denying inspector access.
Nelson’s lawsuit alleges that many procedures she underwent, including microneedling, fall outside the legal scope of practice for estheticians in California. The state board has previously confirmed that such treatments require specific medical licenses, which Dakar does not hold. These findings raise serious concerns regarding the safety and legality of the treatments provided at her clinic.
Public awareness and industry impact
In an effort to highlight the potential dangers in the cosmetic industry, Nelson has utilized social media platforms such as TikTok to share her personal journey and the emotional toll it has taken on her. In one widely viewed video, she discusses her permanent disfigurement, stating, “It’s the first thing that I see when I wake up in the morning, the last thing I see before I go to bed.” Her posts have ignited discussions about the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability within the beauty sector.
Nelson’s legal team has initiated a civil suit and filed a complaint with the California Board of Barbering and Cosmetology, requesting the permanent revocation of Dakar’s licenses. This dual strategy seeks to prevent other clients from experiencing similar alleged malpractice in the future.
Nelson continues to advocate for change, emphasizing her goal of fostering transparency in an industry that has long been opaque. She hopes her experience can serve as a cautionary tale for others seeking cosmetic treatments, highlighting the importance of verifying the credentials and practices of skincare professionals.
As the legal proceedings unfold, this case underscores the critical need for regulatory oversight in the beauty industry. Such measures are essential to protect consumers from potential harm.