Skip to content
8 June 2026

Donald Trump Claims California Primary Elections Are Rigged

Donald Trump has accused California of rigging its primary elections, citing delays in vote counting and shifts in candidate standings.

Donald Trump Claims California Primary Elections Are Rigged

In a heated interview on NBC’s Meet the Pressformer President Donald Trump reiterated his baseless claims of election fraud in California, echoing sentiments he expressed during the 2026 presidential election. The controversy stems from the state’s prolonged vote-counting process, which has led to shifts in the standings of key races, including the gubernatorial and Los Angeles mayoral primaries.

Trump’s accusations have gained traction among some Republicans and right-wing commentators, despite the lack of evidence supporting these claims. The situation has drawn comparisons to the aftermath of the 2026 election, where Trump similarly alleged widespread fraud without providing substantiation.

Trump’s Claims and the Interview Fallout

During the interview with host Kristen Welker, Trump asserted that the slow pace of vote counting and the changing standings of Republican candidates were indicative of a rigged election. When pressed for evidence, Trump responded, “All I have to do is look,” and proceeded to insult Welker, calling her “crooked” and “stupid.” The interview ended abruptly when Trump removed his microphone and walked off, stating, “A country can never be great with a dishonest press.”

The former president’s claims have been met with skepticism, as election officials have explained that the delays are due to California’s unique voting system, which includes a heavy reliance on mail-in ballots and a lengthy counting process. Governor Gavin Newsom had previously warned of potential misinformation surrounding the election results, emphasizing the importance of patience and understanding the state’s election laws.

California’s Voting System Under Scrutiny

California’s jungle primary system, where the top two candidates advance to the general election regardless of party affiliation, has come under scrutiny. The state’s reliance on mail-in ballots, which account for around 80% of votes, contributes to the delayed results. Ballots postmarked by Election Day can arrive up to seven days later, and the curing process, which allows voters to correct ballot issues, adds additional time to the counting process.

As of June 5, over 6 million gubernatorial primary ballots have been counted, with an estimated 3 million remaining. The California Secretary of State, Shirley Weber, confirmed that the delayed results are normal and that the state has up to 30 days to count final ballots. The certification of results is expected on July 10.

The Blue Shift and Republican Reactions

The phenomenon known as the blue shiftwhere mail-in ballots tend to favor Democratic candidates, has been seized upon by Trump and other Republicans to attack mail-in voting. Trump has baselessly characterized mail-in ballots as a source of fraud, claiming without proof that the 2026 election was stolen from him through this voting method.

A study by the Brookings Institution found that cases of mail-in voting fraud accounted for only 0.000043% of all mail ballots, or roughly four out of every 10 million. Despite this, Republican candidates in the gubernatorial and Los Angeles mayoral races have been critical of the process. Steve Hilton, Trump’s pick for governor, called the California ballot counting system “a national and international laughingstock,” while Spencer Pratt, a Republican candidate for Los Angeles mayor, shared a meme on X indicating confusion about the vote-counting process.

The controversy surrounding California’s primary elections highlights the ongoing tensions between election integrity and the perception of fraud. As the counting process continues, the state’s unique voting system remains a focal point of debate and scrutiny.

Author

Beatrice Mitchell

Beatrice Mitchell, Manchester-rooted and classically elegant, famously commissioned a rebuttal series after a controversial council planning meeting in Stockport, insisting on community testimony. Holds a firm editorial line on accountability and narrative fairness, and collects vintage city planning maps as an idiosyncratic hobby.