Evaluating Latin American Military Forces in Response to U.S. Aggression

Table of Contents

In a significant shift, the geopolitical landscape of Latin America is evolving due to recent military actions by the United States. Following the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, US President Donald Trump issued stern warnings to Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico. He demanded these nations align with US interests, particularly in combating drug trafficking, or face potential military consequences.

This escalation highlights long-standing issues regarding US involvement in Latin American affairs, raising concerns among targeted governments. Despite their reluctance to collaborate with the US, the military capabilities of these nations are significantly overshadowed by the overwhelming strength of the US armed forces.

The facts

The United States maintains the most powerful military in the world, with a defense budget for projected at $895 billion, representing approximately 3.1 percent of its gross domestic product. In contrast, Brazil, the most formidable military power in Latin America, ranks 11th globally, with Mexico at 32nd, Colombia at 46th, Venezuela at 50th, and Cuba at 67th, according to the Global Firepower rankings.

When comparing military metrics such as active personnel, combat aircraft, tanks, naval assets, and overall military budgets, Latin American nations significantly lag behind the US. In a conventional warfare scenario, particularly involving aerial and naval combat, US dominance is clear.

Asymmetrical warfare and paramilitary forces

While conventional metrics reveal a stark disparity, Latin American countries exhibit notable strengths in paramilitary forces. These forces often work alongside regular military units and employ unconventional tactics to challenge traditional military approaches. This capability for asymmetrical warfare has historical roots, with various armed groups influencing internal security dynamics.

Cuba has the world’s third-largest paramilitary force, comprising over 1.14 million personnel, according to Global Firepower. This includes state-sponsored militias and community defense committees that support the regular military during crises or external threats. The largest of these, the Territorial Troops Militia, serves as a critical civilian reserve force.

In Venezuela, pro-government armed groups known as “colectivos” help maintain political order and intimidate dissenters. While these groups do not formally belong to the military, they are perceived to operate with state endorsement, especially during times of unrest.

The historical context of US intervention

The US-Latin America relationship has been marked by tension and intervention for over two centuries. Historical instances of US interference include the so-called Banana Wars in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, where US forces were deployed across Central America to protect corporate interests. In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt introduced a policy aimed at non-intervention, but this commitment was often undermined during the Cold War.

During this period, the US actively funded operations to overthrow democratically elected governments, often executed by the CIA, established in 1947. Notably, Panama remains the only Latin American nation formally invaded by the US, during “Operation Just Cause” in 1989, aimed at removing President Manuel Noriega.

Current implications and future outlook

Recent threats from the US have reignited fears of military confrontation in Latin America. As nations like Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico assess their military capabilities in light of these threats, the power imbalance becomes increasingly apparent. While conventional forces may struggle against the might of the US, the resilience and adaptability of paramilitary structures could play a critical role in any future conflict.