Skip to content
27 June 2026

How Fossil Fuel Companies Influence Climate Research at Top Universities

A deep dive into the long-standing relationship between fossil fuel companies and U.S. universities, revealing how corporate funding has influenced climate research and policy.

How Fossil Fuel Companies Influence Climate Research at Top Universities

For over three decades, fossil fuel companies have been quietly shaping climate research in the United States. A joint investigation by ProPublica and Drilled has uncovered a complex web of funding that has significantly influenced climate science and policy. This financial support has amplified voices advocating for solutions that do not require a drastic reduction in fossil fuel use, delaying crucial emissions cuts.

The investigation highlights how corporate funding has sponsored entire research centers, paid researcher salaries, and even granted companies veto power over projects. While companies argue they are fostering innovation, and universities maintain that safeguards preserve academic independence, critics see a troubling pattern of influence.

The Influence on Climate Models and Policy

The research produced by these universities has had a profound impact on global climate models and the policy solutions adopted by governments worldwide. By promoting the idea that climate change can be mitigated without significantly curtailing fossil fuels, this research has fostered a misperception that has delayed necessary emissions reductions by decades.

This misperception has been particularly damaging as it has shaped the very models and policies designed to combat climate change. The investigation reveals that the research funded by fossil fuel companies has often emphasized technological solutions and market-based approaches, downplaying the need for systemic changes in energy consumption.

The Colonization of Academia

Benjamin Franta, an associate professor of climate litigation at the University of Oxford, describes this phenomenon as the colonization of academia. He argues that the extensive funding from fossil fuel companies has created a dependency that compromises the independence and objectivity of climate research.

Franta’s concerns are echoed by other critics who worry about the long-term implications of such funding. The presence of corporate offices on campus and the direct involvement of companies in research projects raise questions about the integrity of the scientific process. While universities assert that they have safeguards in place to prevent undue influence, the extent of corporate involvement suggests a more complex dynamic.

The investigation also highlights the role of visual storytelling in conveying these complex issues. Illustrations by R. Kikuo Johnson visual editing by Alex Bandoni and design and development by Anna Donlan have played a crucial role in making the findings accessible to a broader audience.

As the world grapples with the urgent need to address climate change, the influence of fossil fuel companies on climate research remains a contentious issue. The investigation by ProPublica and Drilled sheds light on a critical aspect of this debate, highlighting the need for greater transparency and independence in climate science.

World Cup 2026

Upcoming matches

Fri 26 Jun
Norway
15:00EDTGroup I
France
Senegal
15:00EDTGroup I
Iraq
Today
Panama
17:00EDTGroup L
England
Croatia
17:00EDTGroup L
Ghana

Results

Fri 26 Jun
New Zealand
15FT · Group G
Belgium
Egypt
12FT · Group G
Iran
Uruguay
01FT · Group H
Spain
Cape Verde
00FT · Group H
Saudi Arabia
Updated 15:02 EDT
Author

Henry Anderson

Henry Anderson of Edinburgh, sharp-corporate in demeanour, famously argued to run a council budget deep-dive after a packed Holyrood briefing, choosing public-accountability over easy headlines. Prefers evidence-led interrogation of institutions and collects annotated maps of the Lothians as a private quirk.