How the 10% global tariff affects Canada and the CUSMA carveout

Headline: White House imposes temporary 10% tariff; most Canadian goods spared under CUSMA carveout

Quick take
– The administration has slapped a 10% temporary tariff on a broad swath of imports using Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
– Most Canadian exports are excluded under a CUSMA (USMCA) carveout, preserving many cross-border supply chains.
– This move replaces the prior emergency-based approach after the Supreme Court limited use of IEEPA.
– Expect brisk legal fights, congressional maneuvering, and market jitters over the coming months.

What happened — in plain language
After the Supreme Court tightened limits on using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, the White House switched tactics and relied on Section 122, a statutory authority that allows a temporary tariff without new legislation. The new 10% levy applies broadly, but goods that meet CUSMA rules of origin are largely exempt. That carveout protects significant Canada–U.S. flows — think autos, many farm products and industrial parts — at least for now.

The headline numbers
– Rate: 10% on covered imports.
– Duration: automatically expires after 150 days unless Congress extends the measure.
– Interaction with existing duties: this tariff does not stack on top of Section 232 duties (steel, aluminum, certain autos), which remain separately in force.

Why markets care
This action signals the administration still has tools to adjust trade policy even after the court’s ruling. That matters for investors, CFOs and supply-chain managers watching for three things: which specific goods are covered, how exemptions are administered, and when enforcement begins. Expect short-term volatility in affected stocks and quicker sourcing decisions by companies exposed to the new duty. For retailers and manufacturers outside CUSMA’s protection, higher input costs could squeeze margins if they can’t pass prices along.

Who’s most exposed
– Most vulnerable: import-heavy retailers, consumer-goods firms, and manufacturers that rely on non-CUSMA inputs. They face immediate cost increases and extra paperwork.
– Relatively sheltered: businesses whose imports qualify under CUSMA — notably many auto-related parts, agricultural products and industrial inputs tied to Canada.
– Standing apart: sectors already subject to Section 232 continue to pay those duties; the new order narrows some risks without undoing existing tariffs.

What businesses should do now
– Reprice or re-source: procurement teams need rapid decisions — absorb the cost, raise prices, or find alternative suppliers.
– Tighten documentation: the carveout requires proof of CUSMA eligibility, so prepare for customs checks and extra certification work, which hits smaller exporters hardest.
– Track refunds and disputes: companies that paid IEEPA-era duties may pursue refunds; expect customs cash-flow strain and legal claims.

Legal and policy timeline to watch
– 150-day clock: unless Congress intervenes, the tariff lapses after 150 days. That deadline will drive intense lobbying and quick political calculations.
– Section 301 probes: the administration also intends to pursue longer, formal investigations under Section 301 — a slower route that could lead to more targeted measures.
– Litigation: legal challenges to the Section 122 move are likely. Court battles and appeals could alter the measure’s reach or lifespan.

Market and policy signals to monitor
– Agency guidance: final lists of covered goods, Harmonized System (HS) code mappings, and exact exemption criteria.
– Trade volumes: shifts in import flows for non-exempt items and steady movement where CUSMA applies.
– Corporate filings: updates to margin forecasts, supply-chain disclosures, and contingency notes about potential refunds or duties.
– Political developments: congressional votes, bilateral talks with trading partners, and any retaliatory measures.
– Compliance and litigation: expect heightened documentation demands and early refund or challenge filings.

Why this matters beyond the headline
The administration’s shift to Section 122 keeps a short-term lever for trade action while acknowledging judicial limits on emergency powers. Practically, it leaves many Canada–U.S. supply chains intact but reintroduces cost uncertainty for other imports. Over the next months, agency rules and congressional choices will decide whether this tariff is a brief disruption or the opening salvo of a sustained policy shift — with consequences for sourcing, pricing and corporate strategy. Watch the guidance and the vote count: those will tell the real story.