Table of Contents
Here are the facts: the Lebanese cabinet has acknowledged a military timetable for the next stage of a multi-phase effort to remove armed stockpiles in the country’s southern districts, in the zone between the Litani and the Awali rivers, after army leadership presented plans for a second phase meant to disarm the area and restore state authority. According to official sources, officials warned the operation requires a minimum of four months and that the timeframe may change depending on available resources and ongoing external pressures, including repeated Israeli attacks that hinder movement and logistics.
The facts
The cabinet reviewed a presentation from army leadership detailing the second phase.
The operation area is defined as the territory between the Litani and Awali rivers.
Officials said the phase needs at least four months to be executed, subject to change with resource levels and security conditions.
The consequences
Military planners say repeated Israeli attacks complicate troop movement and supply routes.
Officials warned delays in logistics or shortages of material could extend the timetable.
According to official sources, the cabinet acknowledged the plan but did not set a firm completion date.
Who: the Lebanese cabinet and Hezbollah. What: a dispute over disarmament and a staged military plan to remove armed stockpiles. When: unfolding after the cabinet acknowledged the plan. Where: southern Lebanon, north of the Litani. Why: state institutions seek to implement a broader ceasefire agreement; Hezbollah rejects any disarmament beyond the river line it defines. Here are the facts: the standoff has raised tensions along the border and complicated implementation efforts.
The facts
Here are the facts: according to official sources, the cabinet acknowledged a military timetable for the next phase of weapons removal but did not set a firm completion date. The plan covers southern districts where armed groups hold stockpiles. Hezbollah publicly rejected any effort to impose disarmament beyond the river line it interprets as the southern limit of the ceasefire. The group framed such demands as aligned with the agendas of Israel and the United States and described pressure to hand over weapons north of the Litani as a grave sin.
The consequences
Police confirm that the dispute has heightened tensions along the border. Lebanese officials continue efforts to implement terms of a broader ceasefire negotiated with external mediators. The military timetable aims to reduce armed presence and prevent renewed hostilities. However, lack of agreement with Hezbollah increases the risk of delays and local incidents. According to official sources, the cabinet’s acknowledgment did not resolve the core disagreement.
Latest: the cabinet reiterated support for the staged plan while urging negotiations with non-state actors. According to official sources, implementation details remain subject to further talks and coordination with international mediators.
Here are the facts: the army and the cabinet are carrying out a five-phase plan to secure southern Lebanon, currently being implemented between the Litani River and the immediate border with Israel and planned to extend north to the Awali, with the stated aim of restoring state authority and meeting commitments under the ceasefire accord.
The facts
The military has declared the first phase, covering territory between the Litani River and the border, complete. According to military briefers, the second phase will cover the area from the Litani north to the Awali, roughly 40 kilometres south of Beirut. Briefers told the cabinet that this segment will require at least four months to implement.
Officials stressed the timeframe is conditional. Delays could arise if forces face shortages of personnel or equipment. They also warned access could be hindered by hostile action. The government described the operation as an effort to restore state authority and to comply with ceasefire commitments.
Operational constraints and external factors
According to official sources, implementation details remain subject to further talks and coordination with international mediators. Officials said timelines depend on secure access, logistics and force protection. Police confirm that securing supply routes and clear lines of communication are priorities for the second phase.
Military briefers told the cabinet that adjustments to the plan are possible if on-the-ground conditions change. The latest official statement says coordination with external actors will continue as operations proceed.
Here are the facts: the army says its five‑phase plan depends on logistical capacity and a relatively stable security environment. The operation is under way in southern areas between the Litani and the immediate border. Lebanese spokespeople say the timetable is extendable amid near‑daily air and ground strikes, unexploded ordnance and damaged infrastructure. Coordination with external actors will continue as operations proceed.
The facts
According to official sources, the schedule is flexible. Lebanese spokespeople described the timetable as extendable if obstacles arise. Local sources report near‑daily air and ground strikes across southern areas. The army faces unexploded ordnance, damaged roads and utilities, and civilians displaced and returning home. These conditions complicate logistics for troop movements, equipment transport and secure storage of seized materiel.
Hezbollah’s stance and political fallout
According to official sources, the military must balance technical tasks with political constraints. The army aims to catalogue and remove weapons while avoiding clashes that could reopen large‑scale hostilities. Lebanese officials warned that any incident could have swift political consequences nationwide. Police confirm that security operations will be closely coordinated with government ministries and external partners to minimise escalation.
The news broke at the latest briefing, where officials reiterated that coordination with external actors will continue as operations proceed.
Who: Hezbollah leaders; what: they rejected proposals to disarm north of the Litani; when: the news broke at the latest briefing; where: in Lebanon; why: leaders said disarmament there would serve Israeli aims and international pressure. Here are the facts: senior figures called government moves concessions that could empower attacks. According to official sources, the statements sharpen domestic political divides.
The facts
According to official sources, senior Hezbollah officials explicitly rejected any interpretation of the ceasefire that requires disarmament north of the Litani. They argued that limiting their armaments beyond the agreed area would align with Israeli objectives and external pressure. One senior official said televised government efforts to prioritise disarmament amount to a series of concessions that risk enabling Israeli strikes.
The consequences
These statements complicate the government’s plan to implement military arrangements without sparking unrest or fracturing fragile unity. Officials warn that intensified public debate could impede coordination with security forces and local authorities. The news broke at the latest briefing, where officials reiterated that coordination with external actors will continue as operations proceed.
Who: the Lebanese state and southern communities; what: they face recurrent strikes; when: ongoing; where: southern Lebanon; why: raids and foreign occupation are impeding reconstruction and returns, according to officials. Here are the facts: the news broke at the latest briefing where authorities said strikes hit civilian vehicles and infrastructure and caused fatalities.
The facts
According to official sources, recent raids struck civilian vehicles and public infrastructure. The incidents have produced civilian deaths and damaged utilities. Police confirm reconstruction projects have been delayed. The Lebanese state is advancing a recovery plan while warning that occupation of parts of the border region obstructs displaced residents from returning. The news broke at the latest briefing, where officials reiterated that coordination with external actors will continue as operations proceed.
The consequences
Here are the facts: fatalities and infrastructure damage have slowed rebuilding initiatives. Authorities say the occupation and repeated strikes hamper access for engineers and aid convoys. Israel maintains it targets armed operatives and infrastructure it links to hostile activity, and it has criticized the pace of Lebanese military action as insufficient. According to official sources, the combined effect is prolonged displacement and stalled reconstruction planning.
Officials expect operations and coordination with external partners to continue, and they say security developments will determine the pace of returns and rebuilding.
Who: the Lebanese government. What: it lodged formal complaints with international bodies over repeated sovereignty violations. When: since the ceasefire was negotiated. Where: along the country’s southern border and in diplomatic forums. Why: officials cite thousands of air and ground incidents and dozens of deaths from cross-border operations, and they are urging reduced strikes and full withdrawal to enable civilian returns and reconstruction.
The facts
Here are the facts: according to official sources, authorities report thousands of air and ground incidents since the ceasefire. Reports attribute dozens of fatalities to cross-border operations. The government has filed formal protests with international bodies and pressed diplomatic channels to seek a reduction in strikes and a full withdrawal from occupied areas.
The news broke at the point when planners were preparing a second phase of troop movements. The Lebanese army is expected to proceed with that phase unless conditions on the ground render it impractical.
The consequences
The situation remains fragile. Successful implementation of troop movements and civilian returns requires not only technical execution by the Lebanese army but also political accommodation and concrete security guarantees. Relief for civilians affected by ongoing hostilities is also required to stabilize communities and enable reconstruction efforts.
Security developments will determine the pace of returns and rebuilding. Officials say the army will adjust plans if the operational environment deteriorates, and diplomatic efforts will continue to press for de-escalation.