Skip to content
3 September 2026

President Trump asserts USA’s dominance over Strait of Hormuz amid Iran tensions

President Trump claims USA has control over Strait of Hormuz and suggests renaming it after himself amid ongoing conflict with Iran.

President Trump asserts USA's dominance over Strait of Hormuz amid Iran tensions

The geopolitical landscape in the Middle East is once again under intense scrutiny as President Donald Trump asserts USA control over the Strait of Hormuz. In a series of recent statements, Trump has downplayed the duration of the renewed military campaign against Iran suggesting that the conflict will not last too long.

The Strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway for global oil transit, has become a focal point in the escalating tensions between the USA and Iran. Trump’s claims of control come amidst near-daily attacks on ships in the region, raising questions about the stability and security of this vital maritime route.

Trump’s Assertions of Control and Suggestions for Renaming

President Trump has gone so far as to suggest renaming the Strait of Hormuz after himself, posting on social media, “Now that we have it under USA control, should we change the name Hormuz Strait to TRUMP STRAIT??? Like America itself, it would be ‘hotter’ than ever before!” This suggestion comes less than 24 hours after the USA struck several targets in Iran, resulting in casualties, including two children at a wedding in the southern city of Sirik.

The renewed hostilities have pushed oil prices upwards by around four percent, despite Trump’s claims that the Strait is open and millions of barrels of oil are transiting through it daily. Iran, however, continues to maintain that the waterway is closed and under its control. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) has been reporting attacks on vessels in the Strait almost every day.

The Human and Economic Costs of the Conflict

The conflict has had significant human and economic costs. In the USA, the price of petrol has risen to $4.12 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war started on February 28. The fighting has entered its seventh month, far exceeding Trump’s initial promise of a six-week conflict. Despite this, Trump has continued to claim victory and control over the Strait, asserting that Iran has been defeated militarily.

Critics argue that the conflict was a strategic misstep that is turning into a quagmire. Last month, Trump said he views the Strait of Hormuz as “American territory,” and last week, he unilaterally renamed Lake Ontario as “Lake America” due to ongoing trade disagreements with Canada. These actions underscore the escalating tensions and the USA’s assertive stance in the region.

Military Actions and Retaliations

The USA’s Central Command (CENTCOM) launched a new wave of strikes against Iranian military targets, including air defense sites, radar systems, maritime assets, and facilities linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Iran’s Foreign Ministry responded by insisting that the USA had attacked civilian areas and service infrastructure in several provinces, resulting in fatalities and injuries.

In retaliation, the IRGC launched strikes on USA bases in Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Iraq. The renewed hostilities come after a roughly month-long pause in active hostilities between the two countries. The tussle over the Strait of Hormuz continues, with no clear path to a negotiated truce. Washington has doubled down on its “economic D-Day” threats against Tehran, increasing pressure through sanctions and military action.

The latest round of strikes has further disrupted traffic through the Strait. Kpler, a commodities data and analytics firm, reported a significant drop in the number of ships crossing the Strait, highlighting the ongoing instability in the region. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the UAE have condemned Iran’s retaliatory attacks, describing them as a “heinous” act and a threat to regional security and stability.

Author

Sophie Donovan

Sophie Donovan, Manchester-born and classically elegant, once turned down a commission to chase a long-form piece on Salford’s textile heritage, filing instead from the mill where her grandmother worked. Advocates patient, context-rich features and brings a taste for quiet narrative detail and theatre aficionadoship.