Table of Contents
The release of the second season of Meghan Markle’s Netflix show, With Love, Meghan, has sparked a flurry of critical commentary that echoes the mixed reviews from its debut season. Many critics have not held back, describing the series as “tone deaf” and “self-indulgent.” This eight-part series, which premiered early Tuesday morning, features a lineup of celebrities, including Chrissy Teigen and Tan France.
Yet, despite this star power, many reviewers are left wondering about the show’s underlying purpose.
What’s New in the Second Season?
Sticking to a familiar format, Markle’s second season continues to offer lifestyle tips and home hobbies. However, it seems that the content hasn’t really evolved much from the previous season.
Critics have pointed out a lack of fresh angles, leading to a sense of déjà vu throughout the episodes. The Telegraph gave it a two-star review, calling the latest season “needier” and only “marginally less mad” than the first, which raises eyebrows about the conspicuous absence of Prince Harry in the episodes, even though he is frequently mentioned.
Markle often references her family life, but the noticeable absence of her husband during these intimate moments has led many to question the authenticity of the portrayals. As one critic noted, this series often feels more like a vehicle for self-promotion than a genuine exploration of the couple’s domestic life.
This disconnect hasn’t gone unnoticed, with reviewers expressing skepticism about the calculated nature of Markle’s on-screen interactions.
Critical Reception: What’s the Buzz?
The critical response has been largely negative, with many suggesting that the series lacks depth and meaning.
The Times of London described it as “a series in search of meaning,” urging viewers to reconsider their commitment to sticking with the remaining episodes. The tone of the reviews often oscillates between bemusement and outright disdain, with phrases like “self-indulgent” and “painfully contrived” popping up frequently.
Likewise, The Guardian shared similar sentiments, stating that the new episodes are “so painfully contrived” they slip into the realm of absurdity. Critics have pointed out that many of Markle’s conversations seem overly scripted and lack spontaneity, which detracts from the authenticity audiences might expect from a lifestyle series. This has sparked a broader conversation about celebrity culture and the expectations placed on public figures, especially those who have undergone significant lifestyle changes.
What Lies Ahead for ‘With Love, Meghan’?
As the second season continues to roll out, one pressing question remains: will Markle adapt her approach based on the feedback, or will she stick to the same formula that defined the first two seasons? Many critics are doubtful about the show’s potential for growth, often suggesting it has reached a crossroads. With seven more episodes slated to air, viewers are left eagerly anticipating how Markle will navigate this criticism.
Ultimately, the reception of With Love, Meghan reflects broader societal attitudes towards celebrity and authenticity. As Markle continues to share her insights and experiences, the real challenge will be balancing personal storytelling with genuine engagement—after all, no one wants to see a show that feels like a mere echo of itself. For viewers, the choice will be whether to keep watching or to heed the critics’ warnings.
