in

Texas takes a stand against foreign land purchases amid security concerns

Texas flag with a backdrop of farmland and security symbols
Texas takes action against foreign land acquisitions amid rising security concerns.

In a bold move reflecting growing national security concerns, Texas lawmakers have introduced legislation aimed at blocking foreign entities from purchasing land within the state. This initiative, spearheaded by Republican state Rep. Cole Hefner and state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, is being hailed as the strongest legislative effort in the nation to combat potential threats posed by hostile foreign powers.

The bill, known as Senate Bill 17 (SB17), is designed to prevent governments and organizations linked to countries like China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia from establishing a foothold in Texas.

Understanding the implications of SB17

SB17 is not just a reactionary measure; it is a proactive approach to safeguarding Texas’s land and resources.

Hefner describes the legislation as “model legislation” that targets actions and affiliations rather than race or nationality. The bill aims to shut down land purchases that could pose a national security threat, emphasizing that if individuals or entities are acting on behalf of a hostile foreign adversary, the state will reclaim that land.

This legislation comes in the wake of alarming incidents, such as a retired Chinese general acquiring over 140,000 acres near Laughlin Air Force Base, raising red flags about foreign influence in sensitive areas.

Key provisions of the legislation

Under SB17, the definition of “real property” is broad, encompassing agricultural, commercial, industrial, and residential land, as well as mines and timber.

The law empowers the Texas attorney general to investigate and block land deals that pose risks to public health or safety. Notably, the legislation includes exemptions for U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents, ensuring that personal homesteads are protected.

Hefner has made it clear that the bill’s focus is on national security, not xenophobia, stating, “This has nothing to do with skin color or ethnicity. It’s about protecting Texans and Americans from foreign espionage and influence.”

The broader impact and future implications

As SB17 is set to take effect on September 1, there is hope among Texas lawmakers that this legislation will inspire similar measures across the country. Hefner emphasizes the need for a collective awakening to the threats posed by foreign entities, urging that this is not a partisan issue but a matter of national security. The legislation aims to ensure that Texans can live freely and safely, free from the influence of foreign adversaries. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the implications of SB17 could resonate far beyond Texas, potentially reshaping how states approach foreign investments and land ownership.

Okanagan landscape showing signs of drought risk

Okanagan’s water crisis: Preparing for a potential drought this summer