Skip to content
30 September 2026

US High Court Ends Stay, Paving Path for Christa Pike’s Execution

Supreme Court’s 2‑1 vote lets Tennessee proceed with Christa Pike’s execution, ending a 200‑year hiatus for female death penalties in the state.

US High Court Ends Stay, Paving Path for Christa Pike's Execution

The United States Supreme Court intervened on Wednesday, overturning a stay issued earlier that day by a federal appeals court. In a narrow 2-1 ruling the high court cleared the path for Tennessee to carry out the lethal injection of Christa Pike a 50-year-old woman whose death sentence dates back to a 1995 murder. The decision marks the first execution of a woman in Tennessee since 1820, ending a two-century gap in the state’s death-penalty history.

Supreme Court action and dissent

Justice Brett Kavanaugh signed the order that vacated the lower-court stay, prompting the Tennessee Department of Correction to confirm that the execution would proceed that night. The ruling was opposed by the Court’s liberal wing: Justices Sonia SotomayorElena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson filed a dissent, arguing that moving forward would preempt Pike’s still-pending legal challenges and effectively deny her a full review of the conviction.

Governor’s refusal to grant clemency

Governor Bill Lee of Tennessee declined to intervene. In a statement released on Monday, he said, “After deliberate consideration of Christa Gail Pike’s request for clemency and after a thorough review of the case, I am upholding the sentence of the state of Tennessee and do not plan to intervene.” Lee’s response came after both the governor and the state’s attorney general rejected appeals that the execution should be delayed.

The 1995 crime that led to a death sentence

On 12 January 1995 Pike, then 18, and her 17-year-old boyfriend Tadaryl Shipp lured 19-year-old classmate Colleen Slemmer to a wooded area behind the University of Tennessee’s agriculture campus in Knoxville. Prosecutors say Pike slit Slemmer’s stomach and throat with a box cutter before Shipp smashed her head with a rock and carved a pentagram into her chest. The murder shocked the nation for its brutality and the ages of those involved. Shipp received a life sentence with parole eligibility, while Pike was the only defendant sentenced to death.

Abuse, mental illness, and the clemency petitions

During decades of appeals, Pike’s defense revealed a history of severe childhood trauma. Federal defender Stephen Ferrell testified that Pike endured sexual abuse from toddlerhood through her teens, including rape at ages 11 and 17. She was later diagnosed with bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Pike’s own words, included in her clemency petition, read: “I was a mentally ill 18-year-old kid. It took me numerous years to even realize the gravity of what I’d done.” Civil-rights groups such as the ACLU and Amnesty International urged the governor to commute the sentence, asserting that the death penalty was disproportionate given her mental-health background.

Victim’s family and public reaction

May Martinez, the mother of Colleen Slemmer, expressed that she would attend the execution, saying, “Not a day goes by, or a minute goes by that I do not think about Colleen. Holidays are the worst.” Martinez remembered her daughter as a computer-enthusiast who loved roller skating and volunteered with the Special Olympics. The case continues to divide public opinion, with some viewing the execution as a measure of justice, while others see it as a continuation of trauma.

As the execution date approaches, the legal landscape surrounding juvenile offenders and the death penalty remains under scrutiny. The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Roper v. Simmons barred capital punishment for crimes committed under age 18, yet Pike was 18 at the time of the murder, placing her case in a narrow legal gray zone. With the Court’s recent order, Tennessee is set to proceed with an execution that has not been carried out on a woman in the state for two centuries.

Author

Jordan Wells

Jordan Wells covers Pride, policy and the cultural arc with equal seriousness. Reports on legislation, films, and the writers reshaping queer narrative today.