Music is more than just a form of entertainment; it is a powerful tool that helps Americans define their identity, beliefs, and perceptions of the country. This complex relationship between music, politics, and national identity was the focus of a recent episode of Lehigh Valley Political Pulse, featuring political scientist Chris Borick from Lehigh University.
Borick’s discussion with host Tom Shortell delved into how people often connect with artists and genres that resonate with their values, creating a sense of community and reinforcing their political viewpoints. This connection explains why certain musical styles become synonymous with specific political ideologies.
The Role of Music in Political Reinforcement
Borick highlighted that while many people claim they want no politics in their music, they often seek out songs that align with and reinforce their existing beliefs. This phenomenon was evident in the use of the Village People’s “YMCA” at President Donald Trump‘s rallies. Despite the song’s lack of overt political messaging, its energetic and communal atmosphere seemed to appeal to the crowd.
“I think he just likes it,” Borick said, referring to Trump’s use of the song. “I think he likes the dance. I think he likes the atmosphere it provides at rallies.”
Protest Songs and Political Backlash
The conversation also touched on the backlash faced by The Chicks, formerly known as the Dixie Chicks, after they criticized President George W. Bush during the Iraq War. Their comments clashed with the expectations of many country music fans, who often associate the genre with patriotism and political conservatism, especially in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks.
Borick emphasized that while individual songs rarely change election outcomes or public policy, they can become cultural touchstones that define eras and preserve political movements for future generations. He cited Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young’s “Ohio” written in response to the Kent State shootings, as an example of a song that became a lasting symbol of protest and remembrance.
Songs with Complicated Political Legacies
The discussion also explored songs with more nuanced political legacies, such as Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the U.S.A.”. Despite its critique of the nation’s treatment of Vietnam veterans, the song was embraced by politicians like Ronald Reagan as a patriotic anthem. Borick noted the importance of patriotic criticism, stating, “I think it is patriotic to criticize and hold your country up to a higher standard.”
This episode of Lehigh Valley Political Pulse offers a fascinating look into the intersection of music, politics, and national identity. To watch the full conversation, visit the YouTube player above or subscribe to Lehigh Valley Public Media’s channel. Additionally, sign up for the new Political Pulse newsletter to stay informed about upcoming discussions and insights.
