Skip to content
6 June 2026

New York State Imposes One-Year Freeze on Data Center Permits

New York State has passed a groundbreaking bill to impose a one-year moratorium on data center permits, sparking a heated debate between environmental advocates and industry stakeholders.

New York State Imposes One-Year Freeze on Data Center Permits

The New York State Legislature has taken a significant step in regulating the data center industry by passing a one-year moratorium on new permits. This move comes amid growing concerns about the environmental and economic impacts of these power-hungry facilities. If signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul, New York will become the first state in the nation to enact such a freeze.

The Responsible Data Center Development Act not only imposes a moratorium but also mandates local public hearings before construction and a statewide environmental impact report within a year and a half. This legislation targets data centers with a peak energy use above 20 megawattsaddressing the substantial energy and water consumption associated with these facilities.

The Push for State-Level Intervention

State Sen. Kristen Gonzalez, a Democrat who introduced the bill, emphasized the need for appropriate infrastructure and processes to protect communities from rising utility bills and environmental degradation. “We need state-level intervention,” said Gay Nicholson of Sustainable Finger Lakes, highlighting the burden on local planning boards.

Opposition to data centers has been mounting across upstate communities, from Niagara and Erie counties to the town of East Fishkill. Local residents and environmental groups argue that these projects, often proposed in rural areas, lack transparency and impose significant resource demands.

The Industry’s Response

The bill has faced criticism from industry groups and economic development advocates. Khara Boender, director of state policy at the Data Center Coalition, argued that a statewide moratorium would discourage further investment and undermine New York’s economy. Ken Pokalsky, vice president of the Business Council of New York State, expressed concerns about the adverse economic development impacts of the bill’s mandates.

Ed Nadeau, president of the New York State Pipe Trades Association, voiced concerns about job losses during the moratorium but did not oppose other aspects of the bill. Workers in his union have been training for years to build and maintain these facilities, highlighting the economic benefits they bring.

Local Opposition and Transparency Issues

The town of Oneonta in central New York has enacted its own moratorium on data center development. William Rivera, the town supervisor, highlighted the challenges local governments face in accessing information about data centers and their impacts. Historically, developers have been reluctant to share details about energy and water use, sometimes requiring local officials to sign non-disclosure agreements.

The newly passed state legislation aims to address these transparency issues by requiring developers to disclose their use of local resources and make efforts toward energy efficiency goals. The bill also mandates that existing data centers disclose greenhouse gas emissions data and use increasing amounts of renewable energy, starting at a third of their energy consumption in 2030.

New York’s electricity grid operator has warned that data center projects will put pressure on the grid and complicate efforts to retire aging gas-fired power plants. The new bill seeks to mitigate these impacts by promoting renewable energy use and ensuring that data centers operate more sustainably.

As the debate continues, the fate of the moratorium rests with Governor Kathy Hochul, who has expressed the need for communities to benefit from data center projects without draining local power sources. The outcome of this legislation will have significant implications for the future of data centers in New York and beyond.

Author

Sophie Donovan

Sophie Donovan, Manchester-born and classically elegant, once turned down a commission to chase a long-form piece on Salford’s textile heritage, filing instead from the mill where her grandmother worked. Advocates patient, context-rich features and brings a taste for quiet narrative detail and theatre aficionadoship.